 |
power supply：DC 24V communication protocol：Lora/4G protection level：IP67 working Temp：-20~65℃ Media Temp：0~70℃ valve caliber：DN50~DN150
| Quantity: | |
|---|---|
QT-02-L/G
QOTO
| Power supply | Solar panel+18650 battery 2pcs or 4pcs |
| Telecomunication protocol | Lora/NB-iot/4G |
| Torque | 50Nm |
| Valve size | DN50-DN100 |
| Protection level | IP67 |
| Working Temp | -20~65℃ |
Operations
) Reduced cost – significant reduction of installation, engineering and retrofit cost.
) Faster start-up – reduced engineering time and installation of required support hardware， allows the operation to quickly return to production rather than long shutdowns.
) Multiple power options – options include battery power, line power, loop power, solar, or other energy harvesting options.
) Easy set-up – automatic built-in functions such as channel hopping, self-configuration network,
Wireless alternative benefits
Field-proven wireless communication is everywhere. With several technologies and/or standards to choose from, wireless technologies are installed worldwide in basically every industry and thousands of applications – including many pipelines. The selection of any given technology is often driven by user preference or by the user’s automation supplier or existing sensor technology. There are many published case studies that clearly outline the value proposition and savings for going wireless vs running more wires, including online estimating tools and calculators. The bottom line is that businesses cannot afford to ignore the facts: wireless monitoring is a cost-effective alternative and makes the best business case. Wireless is here to stay. Business benefits of moving to a wireless monitoring strategy include three categories of business issues –infrastructure, operations and performance.
| Power supply | Solar panel+18650 battery 2pcs or 4pcs |
| Telecomunication protocol | Lora/NB-iot/4G |
| Torque | 50Nm |
| Valve size | DN50-DN100 |
| Protection level | IP67 |
| Working Temp | -20~65℃ |
Operations
) Reduced cost – significant reduction of installation, engineering and retrofit cost.
) Faster start-up – reduced engineering time and installation of required support hardware， allows the operation to quickly return to production rather than long shutdowns.
) Multiple power options – options include battery power, line power, loop power, solar, or other energy harvesting options.
) Easy set-up – automatic built-in functions such as channel hopping, self-configuration network,
Wireless alternative benefits
Field-proven wireless communication is everywhere. With several technologies and/or standards to choose from, wireless technologies are installed worldwide in basically every industry and thousands of applications – including many pipelines. The selection of any given technology is often driven by user preference or by the user’s automation supplier or existing sensor technology. There are many published case studies that clearly outline the value proposition and savings for going wireless vs running more wires, including online estimating tools and calculators. The bottom line is that businesses cannot afford to ignore the facts: wireless monitoring is a cost-effective alternative and makes the best business case. Wireless is here to stay. Business benefits of moving to a wireless monitoring strategy include three categories of business issues –infrastructure, operations and performance.
